4 min readJun 25, 2026 05:42 PM IST
Denmark’s immigration minister Morten Bødskov has announced plans to ban the adhan, the Islamic call to prayer, The Telegraph reported. He claims that some parts of the country feel like “a suburb of Islamabad”. Migrants in Denmark continue to face suppression under Bødskov, the report added.
Why is Denmark doing this now?
Denmark is once again considering a nationwide ban on the Islamic call to prayer, reviving one of Europe’s most contentious immigration debates as the country’s government pushes ahead with some of the continent’s toughest integration policies.
What the immigration minister said
Morten Bødskov, a member of the centre-left Social Democrats party, announced that the new government would resume an investigation into the legality of imposing a ban. “The call to prayer should not be heard over Danish rooftops,” Bødskov told news outlet Ritzau. “It has no place in Denmark, and you shouldn’t be in any doubt whether you’ve ended up in a suburb of Islamabad when you walk around Denmark.”
In some parts of the country, like Copenhagen, bylaws already prohibit the broadcast of the call to prayer from loudspeakers in minarets due to strict noise regulations. Mr Bødskov also asserted that a creeping “Islamisation” in Denmark was “consuming too much public space” while announcing the investigation of the bans.
Why the proposal has returned
Howls from the Muslims!.Denmark plans to ban Islamic call to prayer: ‘Shouldn’t sound like a suburb of Islamabad’ https://t.co/I8fQyWbgsm via https://t.co/QHByxrgmbJ
— Justin Lees🏴 (@alfamito155) June 25, 2026
The Adhan is a prayer that is performed five times a day to summon Muslim worshippers to their mosque, typically announced through loudspeakers in minarets.
This is a third instance where a Danish immigrant minister has attempted to build a legal framework for banning the call to prayer, after similar attempts by the Social Democrats in 2020 and 2025.
This is followed by Mette Frederiksen’s third term, beginning earlier this month. Her administration has overseen some of Europe’s toughest migration policies and is often cited as a model for the “low immigration left,” which is an approach that some centrist political figures elsewhere in Europe have looked to emulate.
How Denmark’s immigration policy has hardened
The Adhan review fits a pattern of increasingly hardline migration policy that has defined Danish politics for years. The country’s “ghetto” legislation gives authorities the power to compel residents to leave neighbourhoods classified as having too high a share of foreign-born residents. Separate rules allow officials to require asylum seekers to hand over jewellery and other valuables to offset housing costs, while those whose applications are ultimately denied are left without financial assistance.
This approach has made Denmark something of an outlier among its neighbours. During the 2015 refugee crisis, when well over a million people crossed into Europe fleeing war and instability in West Asia, Denmark took in markedly fewer asylum seekers than comparable countries. Its foreign-born population remains smaller as a result, a gap that successive governments, including Frederiksen’s, have treated as a policy success rather than an anomaly to correct.
For context, Denmark is home to roughly 270,000 Muslims out of a total population of about six million, served by an estimated 100 mosques. Notably, the Grand Mosque of Copenhagen already refrains from broadcasting an outdoor call to prayer under a voluntary arrangement with local authorities, a fact critics have cited as evidence that the practice is far less widespread than the political rhetoric around it suggests.
Story continues below this ad
What happens next?
Reaction has fallen along predictable lines. Supporters of a ban say loudspeaker broadcasts are an anachronism in an age of smartphone alarms and argue the issue is really about noise and shared public space, not religion.
The government has yet to say when it expects the legal review to conclude. Whether the proposal ultimately becomes law could depend on its compatibility with Denmark’s constitutional protections and European human rights obligations.
Stay updated with the latest – Click here to follow us on Instagram



