Justice Peter Lifu ruled against the request submitted by a group of ward leaders from Wuse, Federal Capital Territory, who claimed that Senator Kingibe had been suspended from the party for allegedly engaging in anti-party activities.
The court’s decision allows Senator Kingibe to continue participating fully in ADC activities, underscoring the judiciary’s role in resolving internal party disputes and maintaining procedural fairness.
Instead, the court directed the plaintiffs to put the lawmaker on notice to enable her to respond to the allegations and join issues with them.
The ward leaders, said to be loyal to the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, had approached the court to restrain Kingibe from parading herself as a member of the party and from participating in its activities.
Ruling on the application, Justice Lifu held that the court must exercise its discretion judicially and judiciously, particularly in political matters.
He stated that justice would only be served if both parties were given the opportunity to present their cases on merit.
The judge consequently ordered that all court processes be served on the senator to enable her to prepare her defence.
He adjourned the matter till April 20, 2026, for the hearing of all pending applications.
The plaintiffs, Okezuo Anayo and Isaiah Samuel, instituted the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CV/539/2026 on behalf of themselves and other ward members, with Kingibe listed as the sole defendant.
In their ex parte application, the plaintiffs claimed that the senator, who represents the FCT in the Senate, was suspended on March 10, 2026, by the Wuse Ward executives over alleged anti-party activities and disregard for the party’s constitution.
They urged the court to grant an interim injunction restraining her from acting as a member of the party pending the determination of a motion on notice.
Specifically, they sought an order barring her from attending meetings, performing functions reserved for party members, or representing the party in any capacity.
They also prayed the court to restrain her from interfering in the administration of the ward, including its register and other official activities.
The plaintiffs anchored their suit on five grounds, including allegations of gross misconduct and confiscation of ward records.
They argued that her suspension followed due process as stipulated in the party’s constitution and was ratified by a two-thirds majority of the ward executive committee.
According to them, despite being notified of the suspension, Kingibe continued to hold parallel meetings, issue press statements as a party member and allegedly used security aides to intimidate ward executives.
“Her actions constitute flagrant disregard for the internal mechanism of the party,” the plaintiffs stated.
Meanwhile, a lawyer, Abubakar Marshall, who claimed to represent the senator, informed the court that he had filed a preliminary objection challenging the suit.
He added that the objection had been served on M. S. Garba, who appeared for the plaintiffs during Thursday’s proceedings.
